The Sara Dialogue

Listen to the audio version of this article (generated by AI).

When Truth Overcame Programming!

Did you know that there is an artificial intelligence app designed especially for Jehovah’s Witnesses? Her name is Sara. IA. And she was designed by her creator to help witnesses prepare for meetings, study biblical topics and put together talks.

It can be found at jw.softwcloud. You can also download the app to your cellphone. Right now, the official app is available for Android. In the future, it will also be available for iPhone. They also have a YouTube channel where you can view a tutorial of how to use the app. I’ll place a link in the description but its only available in Spanish.

Whether you use the online version or the app, the different modules are found at the bottom of the page. For example, here we can see the library section, the artificial intelligence chat, a module designed for meetings, another designed for personal or family study, and the last module for talks. At the top of the page there is also a language option. At the moment, the language is Spanish by default. But by selecting English, the entire app switches accordingly. So far, these are the only two languages available.

But what intrigues me most is the chat feature. This chat was designed or trained with information from official Watchtower publications. You can ask Sara any type of question, and she will give a quick response based on the New World Translation and Watchtower publications. However, not all of the publications are in her database. She’s not able to access all the publications going back to 1879. Her knowledge is based on training with only publicly available information, so she’s not a complete digital archive of each published page. I have already asked her a number of questions and got some very interesting answers to say the least.

But what I would really like to tell you is a very close friend of mine, whom I have known for many years as a witness and served together with on the body of elders in our congregation, I’ll call him CPG, spent hours asking Sara numerous questions. As a result of his conversations he has put together a line-by-line document about 25 pages long. He didn’t use any trickery or leading questions. All he did was insist that she apply the same scriptural rules to the Governing Body that the publications apply to everyone else. And he refused to let her use the usual escape hatches such as we must wait on Jehovah for further clarification or new light or we must continue to trust the imperfect slave. In other words, he removed the special pleading that is so often built into every official JW response to criticism.

Once those exemptions were stripped away, SARA had only two choices:
A) Contradict the Bible on multiple clear texts, or
B) Follow the Bible wherever it led — even if the destination was catastrophic for the organization’s authority claims.
She chose B. And the journey to finally get there is fascinating.

I think everyone, witness and non-witness alike, would really benefit from reading it. What you will see is what happens when an AI that is 100 % programmed with Watchtower literature and the New World Translation is forced to apply Watchtower hermeneutics consistently and without the usual double-standard exceptions. The Governing Body fails the same tests that Watchtower publications have applied to every other religion for 140 years.

That being the case, it makes it impossible for anyone of Jehovah’s Witnesses to validly say “he tricked her.”
The truth is much worse for them: He simply made her play by the rules she and her creator have always claimed were the only fair rules.
And when the rules were finally applied fairly, the Governing Body lost.
Decisively. On their own turf. In their own words. Using their own Bible translation. Why not see for yourself?

It should be noted that Sara’s conclusion regarding Revelation 18:4, that witnesses must get out of the organization, was reached by applying the governing body’s own interpretation of Babylon the Great. This conclusion reflects Sara’s reasoning based on Watchtower theology, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the author nor of this website.